MARKET ANALYSIS
P

• The key development overnight is the decision to delay further U.S. strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure after what were described as constructive discussions between Washington and Tehran. That has immediately reduced some of the extreme short-term fear that had built into markets going into the weekend.

• The reaction is strong because positioning had become heavily defensive. Futures are rebounding sharply this morning, not necessarily because investors suddenly believe the macro environment is clean again, but because markets had become very compressed and badly needed some form of positive catalyst to unwind that pressure.

• The most important move sits in oil. Crude has pulled back aggressively after last week’s surge, and that matters more than anything else because oil had become the dominant force driving recent equity weakness.

• Over the last two weeks, rising energy prices were beginning to create a much more difficult macro picture: inflation pressure was re-emerging, bond markets were becoming unstable, and equities were increasingly having to price the possibility that central banks remain restrictive for longer.

• A temporary cooling in oil immediately softens that pressure, which is why equities are reacting so strongly at the open.

• What matters now is that this remains a pause rather than a resolution. The geopolitical backdrop has not disappeared, and the market still knows that one negative headline can reverse sentiment very quickly again.

• That is why today’s move should not automatically be read as a clean return to risk-on conditions. It is better understood as a market that had become extremely stretched to the downside and finally received an excuse to rebound.

• You can see that clearly in sector behaviour. The groups that were hit hardest by energy pressure, cyclicals, industrials, financials, airlines, and growth, are all attempting to rebound together this morning.

• Energy itself is softer, which also fits that picture. The strongest relative strength group of the last two weeks is giving some ground back as crude pulls lower.

• Precious metals are also reacting in line with that shift. As immediate safe-haven demand eases slightly, gold and silver are both under pressure, which again reinforces that this morning’s move is largely about reduced short-term fear.

• The reason the rebound is so sharp is because markets were already extremely oversold. Volatility had expanded materially, breadth had been pushed deep into washed-out territory, and sentiment had become heavily skewed toward worst-case outcomes.

• In that type of environment, even a temporary easing in macro stress can produce a much larger upside reaction than people expect.

• The key question now is whether this buying survives after the open. If volume expands and price holds, this can develop into a broader relief move. If participation fades again into strength, then this simply becomes another short-covering bounce inside a still fragile tape.

• For now, the main takeaway is that markets have been given breathing room, but they still need to prove they can hold that breathing room once real trading begins.

Nasdaq

18.81%: over 20 EMA | 16.83%: over 50 EMA | 39.60%: over 200 EMA

• The QQQ is bouncing exactly where a technical response was most likely to appear: the rising 50-week EMA at $577, a level that was tested last week on 122% relative volume, which immediately told us real institutional participation was involved at that support zone.

• Friday’s selloff into that level was particularly important because it came on 140% relative volume, meaning this was not passive weakness — it was an aggressive distribution day into a major weekly support area.

• This morning’s gap higher is largely a relief reaction to the temporary geopolitical easing, but technically the most important consequence is that the Nasdaq is being pushed back above the 200-day EMA, which had briefly been lost — a level that had held continuously since May 2025, when the broader Stage 2 advance began.

• That matters because once a market loses a long-held 200-day EMA during an unstable macro backdrop, downside momentum often accelerates very quickly. For now, that immediate technical damage is being delayed.

• That said, caution remains critical here. A large gap higher after a heavy-volume flush often creates ideal conditions for an early gap fill lower, especially when the underlying macro catalyst is still fragile.

• The reality is that a five-day pause in escalation does not materially change the broader conflict structure, and markets can very easily overprice short-term relief before reassessing risk once regular cash-session liquidity returns.

• We would therefore be very cautious chasing strength into the open. At this stage, this does not yet justify fresh long exposure.

• The more important test is whether QQQ can absorb early selling and build acceptance back above that 200-day EMA into the close. Without that, this simply remains a relief bounce inside a broader fragile corrective phase.

S&P 400 Midcap

12.25%: over 20 EMA | 17.50%: over 50 EMA | 40.25%: over 200 EMA

• MDY is showing the same technical reaction: a bounce directly from the combined support of the rising 50-week EMA and 200-day EMA, both of which were tested on Friday during a very sharp high-volume selloff.

• The volume profile there was even more extreme than QQQ, with Friday closing at 181% relative volume, which confirms just how aggressive the institutional pressure became into that flush lower.

• Given how oversold MDY had already become — with only 12% of components above their 20-day EMA — a reflex rebound from that level was statistically very likely.

• What matters now is understanding that oversold does not automatically mean safe. Oversold conditions simply increase the probability of short-term mean reversion, but they do not remove macro fragility.

• The geopolitical backdrop remains unresolved, and beyond this temporary five-day pause there is still very little that justifies rebuilding meaningful long exposure immediately.

• From a structure standpoint, what we want today is not aggressive upside extension — we want stabilisation.

• A gap fill early in the session would not be problematic as long as MDY can continue holding above that 50-week EMA / 200-day EMA cluster and begin forming a base.

• We have seen this before: during the November–December 2025 pullback, price first stabilised around the same weekly support area before broader upside resumed.

• If that process repeats, this becomes constructive. If support fails quickly again, then Friday’s flush likely becomes only the first stage of deeper weakness.

Russell 2000

15.39%: over 20 EMA | 20.14%: over 50 EMA | 43.05%: over 200 EMA

• MDY is showing the same technical reaction: a bounce directly from the combined support of the rising 50-week EMA and 200-day EMA, both of which were tested on Friday during a very sharp high-volume selloff.

• The volume profile there was even more extreme than QQQ, with Friday closing at 181% relative volume, which confirms just how aggressive the institutional pressure became into that flush lower.

• Given how oversold MDY had already become — with only 12% of components above their 20-day EMA — a reflex rebound from that level was statistically very likely.

• What matters now is understanding that oversold does not automatically mean safe. Oversold conditions simply increase the probability of short-term mean reversion, but they do not remove macro fragility.

• The geopolitical backdrop remains unresolved, and beyond this temporary five-day pause there is still very little that justifies rebuilding meaningful long exposure immediately.

• From a structure standpoint, what we want today is not aggressive upside extension — we want stabilisation.

• A gap fill early in the session would not be problematic as long as MDY can continue holding above that 50-week EMA / 200-day EMA cluster and begin forming a base.

• We have seen this before: during the November–December 2025 pullback, price first stabilised around the same weekly support area before broader upside resumed.

• If that process repeats, this becomes constructive. If support fails quickly again, then Friday’s flush likely becomes only the first stage of deeper weakness.