- Swingly
- Posts
- A Complete Risk Off: Volatility Rising
A Complete Risk Off: Volatility Rising


MARKET ANALYSIS
Here’s What You Need To Know

Markets are entering the new week under clear pressure as multiple crowded trades unwind simultaneously across equities, metals, and crypto.
Futures across the S&P 500, NASDAQ, and Dow are lower following Friday’s sharp reversal, reinforcing that risk appetite remains fragile.
The most important macro development is not a single headline, but the speed and violence of recent moves, which signals rising uncertainty rather than a clean directional shift.
Precious metals have experienced a violent unwind after becoming extremely crowded trades.
Gold briefly fell as much as 10% and silver collapsed over 30% in its largest single-day drop on record, confirming exhaustion rather than healthy profit-taking.
These moves have rippled into broader markets, tightening liquidity and increasing short-term risk aversion.
Crypto markets are echoing this stress, with Bitcoin breaking below $80,000 and extending its decline toward key long-term support levels.
Forced liquidations have accelerated downside momentum, reinforcing that this is not an environment for dip-buying or bottom-fishing.
The US dollar has rebounded sharply after being one of the most crowded shorts in January, adding further pressure to commodities and risk assets.
A stronger dollar, combined with falling metals and crypto, is a classic signal of tightening financial conditions.
Policy uncertainty has increased following President Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh to lead the Federal Reserve.
Markets view the pick as relatively hawkish, which has reopened debate around the future path of rates despite expectations for cuts later this year.
This week also brings heavy event risk, with over 100 S&P 500 companies reporting earnings, including Amazon, Alphabet, AMD, and Palantir.
Friday’s January jobs report adds another major volatility catalyst, particularly given how sensitive markets currently are to macro surprises.
While geopolitical headlines around US–Iran de-escalation have provided brief relief in some global markets, they have not meaningfully improved risk sentiment in US equities.

Nasdaq

QQQ VRVP Daily & Weekly Chart

QQQE VRVP Daily & Weekly Chart
48.51%: over 20 EMA | 54.45%: over 50 EMA | 53.46%: over 200 EMA
The NASDAQ is now trading at its lowest level in roughly two weeks after a sharp and aggressive sell-off.
Relative volume began expanding on Wednesday, January 28th, as price broke down roughly 2.6% over three sessions, which confirms this move is not a simple bear trap.
When price breaks lower on expanding volume, it typically signals real distribution rather than a false breakdown.
The attempted breakout earlier in the week fully failed, with a sharp reversal on 142% relative volume and a breakdown below the 10-week moving average.
While an intraday bounce or gap-fill higher is possible, the bigger issue remains supply overhead and extremely choppy price action.
Thursday’s NASDAQ range was over 2.5%, more than double its average daily range, and the bullish hammer from that session was fully negated on Friday.
This kind of expanding volatility makes bottom-fishing very risky unless you are strictly trading intraday.
Weakness is not isolated to mega-cap tech, as the equal-weight NASDAQ also broke down aggressively.
Although QQQE bounced near the 10-week EMA, a large overhead exhaustion range of roughly 1.8% remains between 105 and 107.
Volume profile shows significantly more shares traded short than long above 106, highlighting heavy supply at recent highs.
This confirms that selling pressure is broad across NASDAQ constituents, not just driven by a few large names.

S&P 400 Midcap

MDY VRVP Daily & Weekly Chart
44.47%: over 20 EMA | 64.82%: over 50 EMA | 64.57%: over 200 EMA
Mid-caps are holding up relatively well despite recent volatility.
MDY rejected its point of control on Friday with very high relative volume and briefly broke below its 10- and 20-day EMAs.
Price has since stabilized just above the 10-week moving average, which remains the most important level to monitor.
On the weekly chart, mid-caps are still clearly in a Stage 2 uptrend that began with the November breakout.
If further weakness develops, the most likely downside test sits near 619, which aligns with prior demand, the 50-day EMA, and the 10-week EMA.
Given the current volatility, attempting to time a bottom is risky, and waiting for confirmation on the close remains critical.

Russell 2000

IWM VRVP Daily & Weekly Chart
49.68%: over 20 EMA | 59.66%: over 50 EMA | 63.85%: over 200 EMA
Small-caps continue to move largely in line with mid-caps, though with heavier selling pressure.
Friday’s session saw roughly 150% relative volume on the daily chart and elevated volume on the weekly chart as well.
Despite the sell-off, IWM remains above its 10-week moving average, which is the key level to defend.
A test of the 255 area is likely, as there is a visible volume gap between Friday’s close and the 50-day EMA.
As long as the 50-day and 10-week EMA hold, the broader Stage 2 structure remains intact.

FOCUSED STOCK
VRDN: A Leading Stock in a Leading Sector

VRDN VRVP Daily & Weekly Chart
ADR%: 4.36% | Off 52-week high: -3.8% | Above 52-week low: +233.3%
Viridian stood out due to its behavior during Friday’s market sell-off.
The stock dropped roughly 6% intraday, exceeding its average daily range, but found strong support at the rising 10-week moving average near 31.34.
Buyers stepped in aggressively, producing a reversal hammer on 153% relative volume, the highest volume since December.
This pullback occurred within a broader contraction following a powerful breakout above the 200-week moving average in November.
Healthcare and pharmaceuticals remain among the most defensive and strongest sectors in the market.
VRDN continues to show exceptional relative strength, with a 99 relative strength rating versus the S&P 500, marking it as a clear market leader.

Did you find value in today's publication?This helps us better design our content for our readers |
Reply